As I have written in a previous
posting, in a very recent election for the position of
“Bundespräsident” ( President of the Federation ) the
Austrians elected one Norbert Hofer, a far right leaning politician.
With the highest number of votes, he
still falls short of the required majority and a run-off election
between him and the person who came second is scheduled for the end
of May.
Mr Hofer received 35 % of the votes
cast.
Now, it so happens, that in one of
Vienna's Districts there is a lady who runs a pub. She was quite
unhappy about the outcome of this vote and on her front door she
posted a sign with the message, that
“If you are one of the 35%, you need
not come in here.”
I think that this innkeeper was wrong.
Dead wrong!
In a Democracy, and Austria still
follows this ideology, any citizen may vote according to his/her
political opinion and conviction. Having voted, the voter cannot be
prohibited from entering a public place.
The following day a group of hoodlums
entered this pub and demolished its furnishings.
These, it is reasonable to assume, were
followers of Mr. Hofer and were in turn, unhappy about this
outspoken, general prohibition, which indicated the rejection of
their candidate.
In an interview, asked his
opinion about this vandalism, Mr. Hofer let it be known that he
thought the action of the innkeeper to have been foolish. He,
however, was not angry with her, but, on the other hand, he fully
understood the resulting reaction of some of the public.
Think about this for a moment: He
“fully understands” the actions of Hooligans, who bring mayhem
and destruction upon private property and he therefore does apparently
not condemn them.
Not with a single word did he speak against such vandalism, which any fair minded politician would have to reject
vociferously. On the contrary, he indicated his “full
understanding” of the anger of parts of the public.
The entire affair reminds one vaguely
of the happenings in Germany in November of 1938, when Hooligans,
members of the Nazi Organization, called the S.A. devastated shops
owned by Jewish merchants.
I may well overstate the similarity,
since one appears to have been the activity of a few hoodlums, not
guided by any political organization, while the other was a
Government-inspired and -directed action.
Nevertheless, Austria should be careful
about playing with fire.
Reading opinions expressed by foreign
press and politicians, the possible election of a right wing
politician is not looked upon with joy, understanding or agreement in
the rest of the western world.
If, however, the majority of the Austrian Public votes for Mr.X, then, in a democratic Austria, Mr. X gets the job.
That's how a Democracy works.
If, however, the majority of the Austrian Public votes for Mr.X, then, in a democratic Austria, Mr. X gets the job.
That's how a Democracy works.
Maybe all of this is just "playing
Politics" and Mr. Norbert Hofer, if elected, will settle down to the
task of being an effective innovative, and democratic Federal President of
Austria.
Reading all his utterances, I recommend
that you not hold your breath.
Bertstravels
would have voted for Dr. Irmgard. Griss
(former President of the Supreme Court of Austria)
No comments:
Post a Comment