Not that tired subject again!
A long ranging discussion lead us
exactly nowhere, since there are many different interpretations of
this concept.
I share the interpretation of the
British Philosopher, Bertrand Russell, who, along with many other
thinkers maintained that
“we may define “faith” as a firm
belief in something for which there is no evidence. Where there is
evidence, no one speaks of “faith”. We do not speak of “faith”
that two and two make four, or that the Earth is round. We
only speak of “faith” when we wish to substitute emotion for
evidence.”
Others described “faith” as a process of active non-thinking, of
the acceptance of ideas not only in the absence of evidence, but in
fact sometimes in spite of existing evidence to the contrary.
In the Roman Catholic Faith, for instance, it is necessary to believe
that during the celebration of a Holy Mass, the waiver of bread
actually changes into the body of Jesus Christ, while the sip of Red
Wine within the chalice changes into the actual blood of the “Son
of God”.
Now, this requires a good portion of “Faith.”
In both, the Catholic, as well as in the Protestant version of
Christianity, Faith is an absolute necessary ingredient of getting to
heaven.
The big difference, as I understand it, is, that The Roman Catholic
teaching requires Faith and Good Works, while the Protestants
and in particular the “Born Again Christians” require Faith
alone.
In both cases “Faith” is the number one requirement. Without
Faith, there is no ticket to Heaven. There is only the slippery Road
to Hell.
Billy Graham, surely one of the most important proponents of the
“born again doctrine” said this in his book ”How to be born
again”: While morality or Do-Goodness may win the approval of
men, it is not acceptable to God, nor does it reflect His full moral
demands.
Now we come to a very tricky part: You or I can decide to do good
works. I or you may make a decision to feed the hungry and clothe the
naked to the extent of our ability and without hesitation we may go
about doing exactly that.
But we just don't believe that Jesus is the
Son of God, in fact we are not even sure that there is an entity with
all the powers of a God. We just lack that “Faith.”
How about Faith? Can you decide tomorrow to have Faith? Can I truly
state that as of right now I will have the degree of Faith required
to achieve heaven? I can do that no more than I can decide that
tomorrow I will have green eyes, and as of right now I shall be 6' 6”
!
Now I have to decide to believe ( have Faith ) in something for which
there is not one shred of evidence, which, in fact, often is contrary
to existing evidence.
The absurdities, contradictions, and downright inanities of the
entire Bible are, for me, completely impossible to believe.
Do I believe in the existence of God? There is no evidence! Therefore
I cannot be a Theist.
Do I believe in the non-existence of God? There is also no evidence!
Therefore I cannot be an Atheist!
Bertstravels
is left with the little but honest corner of the Agnostic.
No comments:
Post a Comment