Amoris Laetitia
(The Joy of Love)
This almost 300 page long (in the
English translation) work by Pope Franciscus deals primarily
with Love within the family and within the Christian community.
I read most of it with great attention,
some of it I just skimmed over, since it seemed either repetitious or
not quite to the point.
(If this sounds presumptuous you must
find it in your christian heart to forgive me.)
If I was able to interpret some of this
AL correctly, I think that Franciscus is, to a large extent, breaking
with Catholic tradition.
Pastors, he says, are to avoid
judgments which do not take into account the complexity of various
situations. It seems to me that up to now, the judgment of the
church was doctrinaire and took into account only the written word of
the entire liturgical output.
( Including, but NOT limited to the Bible)
( Including, but NOT limited to the Bible)
Every person, the AL stipulates,
regardless of sexual orientation ought to be respected in his or her
dignity and treated with consideration. This individual treatment, of
course, can only come from the local clergy and would have to be
subject to the local priest's judgment.
Divorced-remarried persons must be more
fully integrated into the Catholic church and the degree of
participation must be left to a person's conscience.
It is interesting to note that
Franciscus makes no mention of receiving Holy Communion. It may be
assumed, however, that the Eucharist is an integral part of
“participation” in the Catholic Church, and that therefore
Franciscus would like to see a more tolerant approach to receiving
Holy Communion by divorced-remarried persons.
His call, as mentioned above, to “avoid
judgments which do not take into account the complexity of various
situations” might seem to open a door for such individuals to
receive Holy Communion.
It can no longer be said, Franciscus
states, that all those living in any “irregular” situation are
living in a state of mortal sin.
The Church needs to stop applying moral
laws, as if they were “stones to throw at a person's life.”
Gay men and women “need to be
respected in his or her dignity and treated with consideration.”
The above surely is a far cry from the
biblical reactions to homosexuality. God, it is said, destroyed the
City of Sodom because of its homosexual population. And even if the
New Testament does not definitively deal with homosexuality, the
practise within the Roman Catholic Church was one of utter rejection
of openly Gay or Lesbian persons.
In any event, I expect a controlled
outcry from within the R.C.Church, since, if my interpretation is
even only nearly correct, Franciscus is breaking, or attempting to
break with old, iron clad traditions.
In Paragraph 36 he states:
“We also need to be humble and
realistic, acknowledging that at times the way we present our
Christian beliefs and treat other people has
helped to contribute to today's problematic situation. We need a
healthy dose of self-criticism.” ….
Way to go, Francis, finally one of
their own, the Pope yet, tells it like it is, and invites the Church
to examine its rigid rules and regulations.
Then, Francis hits a home-run when he
says this: “Then too, we often present marriage in such a way that
its unitive meaning, its call to grow in love and its ideal of mutual
assistance are overshadowed by an almost exclusive insistence on
the duty of procreation." (He
could have left out “almost”).
I
have heard Catholic Clergy insist that sex is not to be enjoyed, to
be indulged in only between married couples and for the sole reason
to conceive a child. Sex, they insisted, for any other reason is
sinful.
Since God, in whom
they claim to believe, has created Male and Female in their entirety,
he also gave them the experience of orgasmic pleasure, without which,
sex undoubtedly would grind to a screeching halt.
And here comes
Franciscus and carefully, but unequivocally tells his flock that it
is okay to have sex without procreation being its only reason.
The Pope, in this
work, Amoris Laetitia, urges his own staff to be more
tolerant, to examine issues carefully and treat them individually, as
the case may demand.
There would be more in this work to discuss . The above seem to me the most important issues.
If you want more, go read it yourself.
There would be more in this work to discuss . The above seem to me the most important issues.
If you want more, go read it yourself.
Bertstravels
fears that Francis
might run into some objections
from some of his
own Cardinals and Bishops.
No comments:
Post a Comment