was a computer “guru” who became a
so-called “hacker”.
A Hacker is a person who breaks into
somebody's computer for the purpose of stealing information. He is
not much different from the person who breaks into somebody's home
for the purpose of stealing things.
After having hacked the computer
systems of the U.S. Pentagon, U.S, Department of Defense, Citybank,
and sundry other Government Agencies as well as private companies,
banks, universities etc. he was arrested by Australian police,
charged with a number of offenses, find a minimal amount, and
released on a “Good Behavior Bond.”
There followed a period of positive and
negative attention paid to Assange and his e-platform “WikiLeaks”
from a variety of individuals.
In November of 2010 Assange was accused
by Swedish authorities to have, during a visit to their country,
committed a number of sex related offenses.
He fled to England and in August of
2012 asked the Ecuadorian embassy for “political asylum”.
(One wonders what is “political”
about charges of rape?)
Julian Assange has lived in a room
there ever since.
His reluctance to leave the Ecuadorian
Embassy seems to be based on his concern of being arrested by British
Authorities, being extradited to Sweden, possibly tried for the sex
related charges and then being extradited to the U.S.A. where he
would face charges of Espionage activities.
Julian, it seems, is slowly getting
tired of life in one room in a South American embassy and has applied
to the United Nations for a finding on his situation.
In February of 2016 a five member
panel, in a 3:2 decision found that Julian Assange has been subject
to “arbitrary detention and should be compensated".
British and Swedish prosecutors
rejected this finding and, quite frankly, I am at a total loss, how
three out of five panel members can possibly come to such a
conclusion.
No one is detaining the man in the
Embassy. He went there of his own free will and has remained there
voluntarily ever since.
If, as he states, he is innocent of all
charges, why does he not come out, and rely on the honesty of Swedish
prosecutors, who will be unable to convict him. His innocence will be
proven in a Court of Law.
I, in fact, do not believe that these
Swedish charges are what Julian is really worried about. I think he
is more concerned that Sweden will be positively inclined to allow
the U.S.A.'s request for extradition to the USA, where he would be
tried for Espionage.
Julian, the Hacker, now has a choice:
Come out of the narrow protection of Ecuador and face the charges
raised against him, be found innocent or guilty, as the evidence or
lack thereof may direct,
or he may remain “in Ecuador”, in
order to avoid prosecution in Sweden and/or the USA.
The operative word now is “may”.
He
may stay ( as long as Ecuador is willing to host him ),
or he “may” leave and face the music.
Under no circumstances can he claim,
nor should a UN panel have found that he is being
“arbitrarily detained”.
Arbitrary: 1.) uncontrolled or
unrestricted by law.
2.) capricious,
unreasonable, unsupported.
Detention: keeping a person in
custody or confinement.
Neither of these dictionary definitions
fit the circumstances of the case.
If hiding from the Authorities can be
compared to detention, then every accused person who seeks escape
from lawful prosecution could make this same claim.
Al Capone or John Dillinger, both of
whom hid for many years from the authorities could have filed a claim
for “compensation”.
It staggers my imagination how such a
finding could have been arrived at by persons of sound mind.
What do you think ?
Bertstravels